{"id":30968,"date":"2025-07-02T18:00:04","date_gmt":"2025-07-02T18:00:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/?p=30968"},"modified":"2025-07-02T18:23:49","modified_gmt":"2025-07-02T18:23:49","slug":"291-hints-that-a-chatbot-wrote-part-of-a-biomedical-researchers-paper","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/?p=30968","title":{"rendered":"291 Hints That a Chatbot Wrote Part of a Biomedical Researcher\u2019s Paper"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

Scientists show that the frequency of a set of words seems to have increased in published study abstracts since ChatGPT was released into the world.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

Scientists know it is happening, even if they don\u2019t do it themselves. Some of their peers are using chatbots, like ChatGPT, to write all or part of their papers.<\/p>\n

In a paper published Wednesday<\/a> in the journal Science Advances, Dmitry Kobak of the University of T\u00fcbingen and his colleagues report that they found a way to track how often researchers are using artificial intelligence chatbots to write the abstracts of their papers. <\/span>The A.I. tools, they say, tend to use certain words \u2014 like \u201cdelves,\u201d \u201ccrucial,\u201d \u201cpotential,\u201d \u201csignificant\u201d and \u201cimportant\u201d \u2014 far more often than human authors do.<\/p>\n

The group analyzed word use in the abstracts of more than 15 million biomedical abstracts published between 2010 and 2024, enabling them to spot the rising frequency of certain words in abstracts.<\/p>\n

The findings tap into a debate in the sciences over when it is and is not appropriate to use A.I. helpers for writing papers.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
\n
\n

When ChatGPT was introduced<\/a> in November 2022, a collection of words started showing up with unusual frequency. Those words, the investigators report, were not used so often before the release of ChatGPT. They infer that the change in word usage is a telltale sign of A.I.<\/p>\n

In 2024, there were a total of 454 words used excessively by chatbots, the researchers report. Based on the frequency of the A.I.-favored words, Dr. Kobak and his team calculate that at least 13.5 percent of all biomedical abstracts appeared to have been written with the help of chatbots. And as many as 40 percent of abstracts by authors from some countries writing in a few less selective journals were A.I.-generated.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n

.css-ktho12 {
\n font-family: nyt-imperial, georgia, ‘times new roman’, times, serif;
\n margin: 1px 20px 0;
\n text-align: center;
\n}<\/p>\n

.vhs-plugin-controls-progress-timeline,
\n.vhs-plugin-controls-progress {
\n display: none;
\nopacity: 0;
\n}<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n
\n
<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\n

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.<\/p>\n

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and\u00a0log into<\/a>\u00a0your Times account, or\u00a0subscribe<\/a>\u00a0for all of The Times.<\/p>\n

\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.<\/p>\n

Already a subscriber?\u00a0Log in<\/a>.<\/p>\n

Want all of The Times?\u00a0Subscribe<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Scientists show that the frequency of a set of words seems to have increased in published study abstracts since ChatGPT was released into the world.Scientists know it is happening, even if they don\u2019t do it themselves. Some of their peers are using chatbots, like ChatGPT, to write all or part of their papers.In a paper published Wednesday in the journal Science Advances, Dmitry Kobak of the University of T\u00fcbingen and his colleagues report that they found a way to track how often researchers are using artificial intelligence chatbots to write the abstracts of their papers. The A.I. tools, they say, tend to use certain words \u2014 like \u201cdelves,\u201d \u201ccrucial,\u201d \u201cpotential,\u201d \u201csignificant\u201d and \u201cimportant\u201d \u2014 far more often than human authors do.The group analyzed word use in the abstracts of more than 15 million biomedical abstracts published between 2010 and 2024, enabling them to spot the rising frequency of certain words in abstracts.The findings tap into a debate in the sciences over when it is and is not appropriate to use A.I. helpers for writing papers.When ChatGPT was introduced in November 2022, a collection of words started showing up with unusual frequency. Those words, the investigators report, were not used so often before the release of ChatGPT. They infer that the change in word usage is a telltale sign of A.I.In 2024, there were a total of 454 words used excessively by chatbots, the researchers report. Based on the frequency of the A.I.-favored words, Dr. Kobak and his team calculate that at least 13.5 percent of all biomedical abstracts appeared to have been written with the help of chatbots. And as many as 40 percent of abstracts by authors from some countries writing in a few less selective journals were A.I.-generated.<\/p>\n

.css-ktho12 {
\n font-family: nyt-imperial, georgia, ‘times new roman’, times, serif;
\n margin: 1px 20px 0;
\n text-align: center;
\n}<\/p>\n

.vhs-plugin-controls-progress-timeline,
\n.vhs-plugin-controls-progress {
\n display: none;
\nopacity: 0;
\n}<\/p>\n

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and\u00a0log into\u00a0your Times account, or\u00a0subscribe\u00a0for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber?\u00a0Log in.Want all of The Times?\u00a0Subscribe.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":30970,"comment_status":"close","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[34],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-30968","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-science"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30968","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=30968"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30968\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":30971,"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30968\/revisions\/30971"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/30970"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=30968"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=30968"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=30968"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}