{"id":27507,"date":"2025-05-10T01:39:15","date_gmt":"2025-05-10T01:39:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/?p=27507"},"modified":"2025-05-10T02:27:22","modified_gmt":"2025-05-10T02:27:22","slug":"google-agrees-to-pay-1-4-billion-to-settle-2-privacy-lawsuits","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/?p=27507","title":{"rendered":"Google Agrees to Pay $1.4 Billion to Settle 2 Privacy Lawsuits"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

The Texas attorney general brought the cases in 2022 under state laws.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

Google agreed to pay $1.4 billion to the State of Texas on Friday to settle two lawsuits accusing it of violating the privacy of state residents by tracking their locations and searches, as well as collecting their facial recognition information.<\/p>\n

The state\u2019s attorney general, Ken Paxton, who secured the settlement, brought the suits in 2022 under Texas laws related to data privacy and deceptive trade practices. Less than a year ago, he reached a $1.4 billion settlement with Meta<\/a>, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, over allegations it had illegally tagged users\u2019 faces on its site.<\/p>\n

Google\u2019s settlement is the latest legal setback for the tech giant. Over the past two years, Google has lost a string of antitrust cases after being found to have a monopoly over its app store<\/a>, search engine<\/a> and advertising technology<\/a>. It has spent the past three weeks in the search case trying to fend off a U.S. government request to break up its business.<\/p>\n

\u201cBig Tech is not above the law,\u201d Mr. Paxton said in a statement.<\/p>\n

Jos\u00e9 Casta\u00f1eda, a Google spokesman, said the company had already changed its product policies. \u201cThis settles a raft of old claims, many of which have already been resolved elsewhere,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
\n
\n

Privacy issues have become a major source of tension between tech giants and regulators in recent years. In the absence of a federal privacy law, states such as Texas and Washington have passed laws to curb the collection of facial, voice and other biometric data.<\/p>\n

Google and Meta have been the highest-profile companies challenged under those laws. Texas\u2019 law, called Capture or Use of Biometric Identifier<\/a>, requires companies to ask permission before using features like facial or voice recognition technologies. The law allows the state to impose damages of up to $25,000 per violation.<\/p>\n

The lawsuit filed under that law<\/a> focused on the Google Photos app, which allowed people to search for photos of a particular person; Google\u2019s Next camera, which could send alerts when it recognized visitors at a door; and Google Assistant, a virtual assistant that could learn up to six users\u2019 voices and answer their questions.<\/p>\n

Mr. Paxton filed a separate lawsuit<\/a> that accused Google of misleading Texans by tracking their personal location data, even after they thought they had disabled that feature. He added a complaint to that suit alleging that Google\u2019s private browsing setting, which it called Incognito mode, wasn\u2019t actually private. Those cases were brought under Texas\u2019 Deceptive Trade Practices Act.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n
<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The Texas attorney general brought the cases in 2022 under state laws.Google agreed to pay $1.4 billion to the State of Texas on Friday to settle two lawsuits accusing it of violating the privacy of state residents by tracking their locations and searches, as well as collecting their facial recognition information.The state\u2019s attorney general, Ken Paxton, who secured the settlement, brought the suits in 2022 under Texas laws related to data privacy and deceptive trade practices. Less than a year ago, he reached a $1.4 billion settlement with Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, over allegations it had illegally tagged users\u2019 faces on its site.Google\u2019s settlement is the latest legal setback for the tech giant. Over the past two years, Google has lost a string of antitrust cases after being found to have a monopoly over its app store, search engine and advertising technology. It has spent the past three weeks in the search case trying to fend off a U.S. government request to break up its business.\u201cBig Tech is not above the law,\u201d Mr. Paxton said in a statement.Jos\u00e9 Casta\u00f1eda, a Google spokesman, said the company had already changed its product policies. \u201cThis settles a raft of old claims, many of which have already been resolved elsewhere,\u201d he said.Privacy issues have become a major source of tension between tech giants and regulators in recent years. In the absence of a federal privacy law, states such as Texas and Washington have passed laws to curb the collection of facial, voice and other biometric data.Google and Meta have been the highest-profile companies challenged under those laws. Texas\u2019 law, called Capture or Use of Biometric Identifier, requires companies to ask permission before using features like facial or voice recognition technologies. The law allows the state to impose damages of up to $25,000 per violation.The lawsuit filed under that law focused on the Google Photos app, which allowed people to search for photos of a particular person; Google\u2019s Next camera, which could send alerts when it recognized visitors at a door; and Google Assistant, a virtual assistant that could learn up to six users\u2019 voices and answer their questions.Mr. Paxton filed a separate lawsuit that accused Google of misleading Texans by tracking their personal location data, even after they thought they had disabled that feature. He added a complaint to that suit alleging that Google\u2019s private browsing setting, which it called Incognito mode, wasn\u2019t actually private. Those cases were brought under Texas\u2019 Deceptive Trade Practices Act.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":27509,"comment_status":"close","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27507","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-technology"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27507","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=27507"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27507\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27510,"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27507\/revisions\/27510"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/27509"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=27507"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=27507"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=27507"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}