{"id":23681,"date":"2025-03-10T19:46:46","date_gmt":"2025-03-10T20:46:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/medexperts.pro\/?p=23681"},"modified":"2025-03-10T21:25:57","modified_gmt":"2025-03-10T21:25:57","slug":"supreme-court-rejects-an-effort-to-block-states-from-suing-oil-giants","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/?p=23681","title":{"rendered":"Supreme Court Rejects an Effort to Block States From Suing Oil Giants"},"content":{"rendered":"<div><\/div>\n<p id=\"article-summary\" class=\"css-79rysd e1wiw3jv0\">The justices declined to hear unusual arguments from Republican-led states that sought to end lawsuits against energy companies over their role in global warming.<\/p>\n<section class=\"meteredContent css-1r7ky0e\">\n<div class=\"css-s99gbd StoryBodyCompanionColumn\" data-testid=\"companionColumn-0\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">The Supreme Court on Monday declined to <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov\/orders\/courtorders\/031025zor_7758.pdf\" title rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">hear an argumen<\/a>t that aimed to restrict states from suing oil companies for financial damage related to climate change.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">The argument was brought to the high court by 19 Republican attorneys general, representing states including Alabama and West Virginia, who were trying to prevent other states, led by Democrats, from pursuing lawsuits against the oil industry. Those states include California, Connecticut, Minnesota, New Jersey and Rhode Island.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Those Democratic-led states have sued major fossil fuel companies for allegedly deceiving the public for decades about the effects of their greenhouse gas emissions. The cases include a 2023 lawsuit <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/oag.ca.gov\/news\/press-releases\/attorney-general-bonta-announces-lawsuit-against-oil-and-gas-companies\" title rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">filed by California\u2019s attorney general<\/a> against five of the world\u2019s largest oil and gas companies, including BP and Exxon Mobil, and the American Petroleum Institute, a lobbying group that represents fossil fuel interests.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">\u201cThis was never anything more than an attempt to run interference, help the defendants in our cases avoid accountability, and play politics with the Constitution,\u201d said Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison in a statement. He filed <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/climatecasechart.com\/case\/state-v-american-petroleum-institute\/\" title rel=\"noopener noreferrer\" target=\"_blank\">his state\u2019s deception suit<\/a> in 2020.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div data-testid=\"Dropzone-1\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"css-s99gbd StoryBodyCompanionColumn\" data-testid=\"companionColumn-1\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Now, with the Supreme Court\u2019s official rejection, those cases can proceed.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">There are dozens of pending cases designed to force fossil fuel companies to pay monetary damages related to climate change, according to Michael Gerrard, the director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia University.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">In January, the Supreme Court signaled it might not agree with the effort by Republican attorneys general to block lawsuits like these, when the justices <a class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2025\/01\/13\/climate\/supreme-court-hawaii-climate-lawsuit.html\" title>denied an oil-industry request to review a Hawai\u2019i Supreme Court decision<\/a> that allows the state\u2019s climate deception lawsuit to go to trial.<\/p>\n<div class=\"css-1336jj\">\n<div class=\"css-121kum4\">\n<div class=\"css-171quhb\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"css-asuuk5\">\n<div class=\"css-7axq9l\" data-testid=\"optimistic-truncator-noscript\">\n<div data-testid=\"optimistic-truncator-noscript-message\" class=\"css-6yo1no\">\n<p class=\"css-3kpklk\">We are having trouble retrieving the article content.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-3kpklk\">Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1dv1kvn\" id=\"optimistic-truncator-a11y\">\n<hr \/>\n<p>Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/myaccount.nytimes.com\/auth\/login?response_type=cookie&amp;client_id=vi&amp;redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2025%2F03%2F10%2Fclimate%2Fsupreme-court-climate-lawsuits-states.html&amp;asset=opttrunc\">log into<\/a>\u00a0your Times account, or\u00a0<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/subscription?campaignId=89WYR&amp;redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2025%2F03%2F10%2Fclimate%2Fsupreme-court-climate-lawsuits-states.html\">subscribe<\/a>\u00a0for all of The Times.<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"css-1g71tqy\">\n<div data-testid=\"optimistic-truncator-message\" class=\"css-6yo1no\">\n<p class=\"css-3kpklk\">Thank you for your patience while we verify access.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-3kpklk\">Already a subscriber?\u00a0<a data-testid=\"log-in-link\" class=\"css-z5ryv4\" href=\"https:\/\/myaccount.nytimes.com\/auth\/login?response_type=cookie&amp;client_id=vi&amp;redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2025%2F03%2F10%2Fclimate%2Fsupreme-court-climate-lawsuits-states.html&amp;asset=opttrunc\">Log in<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-3kpklk\">Want all of The Times?\u00a0<a data-testid=\"subscribe-link\" class=\"css-z5ryv4\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/subscription?campaignId=89WYR&amp;redirect_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.nytimes.com%2F2025%2F03%2F10%2Fclimate%2Fsupreme-court-climate-lawsuits-states.html\">Subscribe<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The justices declined to hear unusual arguments from Republican-led states that sought to end lawsuits against energy companies over their role in global warming.The Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear an argument that aimed to restrict states from suing oil companies for financial damage related to climate change.The argument was brought to the high court by 19 Republican attorneys general, representing states including Alabama and West Virginia, who were trying to prevent other states, led by Democrats, from pursuing lawsuits against the oil industry. Those states include California, Connecticut, Minnesota, New Jersey and Rhode Island.Those Democratic-led states have sued major fossil fuel companies for allegedly deceiving the public for decades about the effects of their greenhouse gas emissions. The cases include a 2023 lawsuit filed by California\u2019s attorney general against five of the world\u2019s largest oil and gas companies, including BP and Exxon Mobil, and the American Petroleum Institute, a lobbying group that represents fossil fuel interests.\u201cThis was never anything more than an attempt to run interference, help the defendants in our cases avoid accountability, and play politics with the Constitution,\u201d said Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison in a statement. He filed his state\u2019s deception suit in 2020.Now, with the Supreme Court\u2019s official rejection, those cases can proceed.There are dozens of pending cases designed to force fossil fuel companies to pay monetary damages related to climate change, according to Michael Gerrard, the director of the Sabin Center for Climate Change Law at Columbia University.In January, the Supreme Court signaled it might not agree with the effort by Republican attorneys general to block lawsuits like these, when the justices denied an oil-industry request to review a Hawai\u2019i Supreme Court decision that allows the state\u2019s climate deception lawsuit to go to trial.We are having trouble retrieving the article content.Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and\u00a0log into\u00a0your Times account, or\u00a0subscribe\u00a0for all of The Times.Thank you for your patience while we verify access.Already a subscriber?\u00a0Log in.Want all of The Times?\u00a0Subscribe.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":23683,"comment_status":"close","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[34],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23681","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-science"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23681","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=23681"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23681\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23684,"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23681\/revisions\/23684"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/23683"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=23681"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=23681"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=23681"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}