{"id":29746,"date":"2025-06-16T20:22:59","date_gmt":"2025-06-16T20:22:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/medexperts.pro\/?p=29746"},"modified":"2025-06-16T20:25:09","modified_gmt":"2025-06-16T20:25:09","slug":"trumps-cuts-to-n-i-h-grants-are-illegal-federal-judge-rules","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/medexperts.pro\/?p=29746","title":{"rendered":"Trump\u2019s Cuts to N.I.H. Grants Are Illegal, Federal Judge Rules"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div>\n

The judge accused the Trump administration of discriminating against minorities and L.G.B.T.Q. people and ordered the government to restore much of the funding.<\/p>\n

\n
\n
\n

A federal judge on Monday declared the Trump administration\u2019s move to cut hundreds of grants issued by the National Institutes of Health illegal, accusing the government of discrimination against minorities and L.G.B.T.Q. individuals.<\/p>\n

Ruling from the bench, Judge William G. Young of the Federal District Court for the District of Massachusetts ordered the government to restore much of the funding.<\/p>\n

Judge Young, a Reagan appointee with 40 years of experience as a federal judge, said the Trump administration\u2019s rationale for canceling the grants, which support research into topics such as gender identity and equity in health care, appeared to be rooted in prejudice. He noted the administration\u2019s efforts to eliminate any trace of diversity and equity initiatives from the federal government, as well as its attacks on transgender people.<\/p>\n

He said that throughout his career he had \u201cnever seen government racial discrimination like this,\u201d and that he felt duty bound to state his conclusion about the government\u2019s intent.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
\n
\n

\u201cI would be blind not to call it out,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

Judge Young\u2019s ruling echoed arguments during a brief trial earlier in the day in which lawyers from an array of groups said the grants had become a political target.<\/p>\n

Kenneth Parreno, a lawyer representing the American Public Health Association, called the government\u2019s actions part of a campaign to ban \u201cforbidden topics\u201d in science by canceling grants related to race or transgender health.<\/p>\n

\u201cWhat this is, is a slapdash, harried effort to rubber stamp an ideological purge,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

The Trump administration in March began terminating a number of public health grants supporting research on topics such as health equity, racial disparities, vaccine hesitancy, and maternal health in minority communities, sometimes by mechanically scanning for certain terms<\/a>.<\/p>\n

In May, Mr. Trump signed an order called \u201cRestoring Gold Standard Science\u201d that cited a \u201creproducibility crisis<\/a>\u201d and resurrected policy disputes from the Covid-19 pandemic, among other things, as justification for deep changes to the government\u2019s role in research and development.<\/p>\n

In two separate cases that were heard together, a coalition of Democratic-led states and a coalition of unions, researchers and public health organizations each sued to stop a raft of cuts at the N.I.H.<\/a>, which they said jeopardized scientific progress.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/div>\n
\n
\n

In hearings leading up to the ruling on Monday, Judge Young repeatedly pressed for details about the government\u2019s decision making, expressing deep skepticism that it had followed normal, dispassionate processes in terminating the grants.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The judge accused the Trump administration of discriminating against minorities and L.G.B.T.Q. people and ordered the government to restore much of the funding.A federal judge on Monday declared the Trump administration\u2019s move to cut hundreds of grants issued by the National Institutes of Health illegal, accusing the government of discrimination against minorities and L.G.B.T.Q. individuals.Ruling from the bench, Judge William G. Young of the Federal District Court for the District of Massachusetts ordered the government to restore much of the funding.Judge Young, a Reagan appointee with 40 years of experience as a federal judge, said the Trump administration\u2019s rationale for canceling the grants, which support research into topics such as gender identity and equity in health care, appeared to be rooted in prejudice. He noted the administration\u2019s efforts to eliminate any trace of diversity and equity initiatives from the federal government, as well as its attacks on transgender people.He said that throughout his career he had \u201cnever seen government racial discrimination like this,\u201d and that he felt duty bound to state his conclusion about the government\u2019s intent.\u201cI would be blind not to call it out,\u201d he said.Judge Young\u2019s ruling echoed arguments during a brief trial earlier in the day in which lawyers from an array of groups said the grants had become a political target.Kenneth Parreno, a lawyer representing the American Public Health Association, called the government\u2019s actions part of a campaign to ban \u201cforbidden topics\u201d in science by canceling grants related to race or transgender health.\u201cWhat this is, is a slapdash, harried effort to rubber stamp an ideological purge,\u201d he said.The Trump administration in March began terminating a number of public health grants supporting research on topics such as health equity, racial disparities, vaccine hesitancy, and maternal health in minority communities, sometimes by mechanically scanning for certain terms.In May, Mr. Trump signed an order called \u201cRestoring Gold Standard Science\u201d that cited a \u201creproducibility crisis\u201d and resurrected policy disputes from the Covid-19 pandemic, among other things, as justification for deep changes to the government\u2019s role in research and development.In two separate cases that were heard together, a coalition of Democratic-led states and a coalition of unions, researchers and public health organizations each sued to stop a raft of cuts at the N.I.H., which they said jeopardized scientific progress.In hearings leading up to the ruling on Monday, Judge Young repeatedly pressed for details about the government\u2019s decision making, expressing deep skepticism that it had followed normal, dispassionate processes in terminating the grants.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":29748,"comment_status":"close","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[34],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-29746","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-science"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29746","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=29746"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"http:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29746\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":29749,"href":"http:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29746\/revisions\/29749"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/29748"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=29746"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=29746"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/medexperts.pro\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=29746"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}